How you deal if the balance confirmation is mismatch while conducting audit of trade receivables.

When encountering a mismatch in balance confirmation while auditing trade receivables, the following steps can be taken to resolve the discrepancy:

1. Review Documentation: Carefully review the correspondence between the audited entity and its customers regarding the balance confirmation requests and responses. Examine the terms, dates, and any relevant supporting documentation, such as invoices, contracts, and payment records.

2. Communicate with the Entity: Engage in open communication with the entity’s management to discuss the mismatch and gather additional information. Seek explanations for any discrepancies and inquire about any specific circumstances or events that may have affected the balances.

3. Investigate Discrepancies: Conduct further investigation to identify the root cause of the mismatch. This may involve analyzing the audited entity’s internal records, such as sales orders, delivery notes, and customer account statements, to verify the accuracy of the recorded receivables balances.

4. Follow Up with Customers: Contact the customers directly to clarify and reconcile any differences in the balance confirmations. Seek explanations for any discrepancies and request supporting documentation, such as payment receipts or adjustments, to validate the amounts reported by the audited entity.

5. Assess the Impact: Evaluate the materiality of the discrepancies and their potential impact on the financial statements. Consider the implications for the overall audit opinion and determine whether the discrepancies can be resolved through additional procedures or adjustments.

6. Document Findings: Document all findings, inquiries, and resolutions related to the balance confirmation discrepancies. Maintain proper documentation to support the conclusions reached during the audit process.

7. Consider Alternative Procedures: If the discrepancies cannot be resolved or verified through the above steps, consider alternative audit procedures, such as substantive testing or sampling techniques, to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence regarding the accuracy and completeness of trade receivables.

Ultimately, the resolution of balance confirmation mismatches requires a thorough and systematic approach, involving clear communication, investigation, and evaluation of the available evidence. The auditor should exercise professional judgment to determine the appropriate course of action and ensure that the audit opinion is based on reliable and accurate information.

In case the mismatch is material, consider giving a qualified opinion. If the issue is material and pervasive, consider giving an adverse opinion

Study Smart: The Ultimate Exam Guide by Yugantar Gupta
Scroll to Top